Observational studyJMIR formative research2026
Routine Online Psychological Therapy in an Insurance-Based Care Setting: Retrospective Service Evaluation of Real-World Outcomes.
Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Routine Online Psychological Therapy in an Insurance-Based Care Setting: Retrospective Service Evaluation of Real-World Outcomes.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression, anxiety, and stress-related difficulties represent a major global health burden. Online psychological therapy has emerged as a promising approach to increasing access to care, yet evidence from routine, real-world clinical settings, particularly for services delivered without standardized treatment protocols, remains limited.
objectiveThis study aimed to describe symptom change and patient-reported satisfaction associated with routine online psychological therapy delivered within an insurance-based care setting.
methodsA retrospective observational service evaluation was conducted using deidentified routine care data. Clients aged 15 years and older who initiated online psychological therapy and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessments on all 3 outcome measures were included. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress were measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), respectively. Changes in symptoms were examined using paired sample t tests, within-sample effect sizes (Cohen d and Cohen d
resultsA total of 1221 clients were included. Clients completed a mean of 4.7 (SD 1.67) therapy sessions over an average treatment duration of 62.7 (SD 40.4) days. Significant reductions with large within-sample effect sizes were observed for depression (Cohen d=1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.32), anxiety (Cohen d=1.49, 95% CI 1.41-1.57), and perceived stress (Cohen d=1.46, 95% CI 1.38-1.54). A ≥50% symptom reduction was observed in 60.7% (741/1220) of clients for depression, 67.5% (824/1221) for anxiety, and 30.8% (376/1221) for perceived stress. At the end-of-treatment assessment, 80.7% (985/1221) scored below the clinical cutoff for depression (PHQ-9<10) and 79.2% (967/1221) for anxiety (GAD-7<8). Reliable improvement was observed in 56% (688/1221) to 65% (794/1221) of clients, with deterioration below 2% on all measures. Mean patient-reported satisfaction scores ranged from 8.55 (SD 1.71) to 8.96 (SD 1.45) on a 10-point scale, and mean recommendation likelihood was 8.61 (SD 1.88). Therapist-level intraclass correlation coefficients were ≤0.029; effect sizes were 1.27-1.50 under inverse-probability weighting and 0.41-0.50 under zero-change imputation for baseline-screened clients without end-of-treatment assessments.
conclusionsRoutine online psychological therapy delivered within an insurance-based care setting was associated with substantial pre-post symptom reductions, high proportions of clients meeting a descriptive ≥50% reduction criterion and showing reliable improvement, and high patient-reported satisfaction. Because the evaluation used an uncontrolled pre-post design restricted to clients with paired assessments, observed changes cannot be attributed causally to treatment. High satisfaction among responding clients is consistent with acceptability of the model to those clients; feasibility was not formally assessed, and inferences about comparative effectiveness require controlled designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.