Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42790150›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026

Comparative effects of ultrasound, ultraviolet, and microwave treatments on the structure-property relationships of cactus polysaccharide-gelatin composite films.

Shikuan Zhao, Muhammad Aaqil, Feng Zhang, Rui Zhou, Siyu Zhou, Yuanfeng Chen, Cheng Gong, Huiqing Luo, Chongye Fang, Cunchao Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shikuan ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China. Electronic address: 15153216972@163.com.
Muhammad AaqilCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China. Electronic address: aaqilkhan26@gmail.com.
Feng ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Rui ZhouCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Siyu ZhouCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Yuanfeng ChenCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Cheng GongCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Huiqing LuoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Chongye FangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Cunchao ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China; Yunnan Plateau Characteristic Agricultural Industry Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China; Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of China-Cambodia Signiture Agro-Products Green Development, Kunming 650201, China. Electronic address: zcc272744372@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodegradable polysaccharide-protein films are promising alternatives to petroleum-based packaging but often lack adequate structural stability and functionality. Although ultrasound (US), ultraviolet (UV), and microwave (MW) treatments have been individually applied to improve biopolymer films, a systematic comparison on the same film system remains unreported. Here, cactus polysaccharide (CP) was extracted fromOpuntiaspp. with high purity (91.69% polysaccharides, 117.15 μg/g protein, 1.03 mg/g phenolics). CP-gelatin films were fabricated and treated with US (200 W, 20 kHz, 30 min), UV (254 nm, 30 W, 30 min), or MW (300 W, 2450 MHz, intermittent heating). Effects of these physical fields technologies on the structural, physicochemical, mechanical, and functional properties of the films were systematically evaluated. Compared with UV and MW treatments, US treatment resulted in significantly lower moisture content (6.38% vs. 7.09% and 6.78%), water solubility (65.34% vs. 71.51% and 68.22%), swelling index (99.0% vs. 117.7% and 108.5%), and water vapour permeability (1.81 × 10

Indexed as

CactaceaeGelatinMicrowavesPolysaccharidesUltrasonic WavesUltraviolet RaysPermeabilitySolubilityStructure-Activity RelationshipGelatinPolysaccharidesActive packagingCactus polysaccharideGelatin composite filmsPhysical-field treatmentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID42790150
PMCPMC13635943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.