ReviewJournal of food and drug analysis2026
Integration of freshness monitoring and active packaging technologies for aquatic products.
Review in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquatic products are nutritionally valuable but highly perishable, with quality loss driven by microbial spoilage, biochemical changes, including total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), trimethylamine (TMA) and histamine, and physicochemical deterioration, including lipid oxidation, gas production and texture loss. Conventional packaging slows these processes but does not report real-time freshness. This review analyzes how active packaging (antimicrobial, antioxidant, enzyme-inhibiting, and oxygen-scavenging systems, including bio- and nanocomposites) can be combined with freshness monitoring technologies (colorimetric/pH indicators, gas sensors, biosensors, and digital tools such as radio frequency identification (RFID) and Internet of Things (IoT) systems) specifically for fish, shrimp, and mollusks. We first map key spoilage mechanisms and markers, then evaluate active systems for aquatic products and compare three main monitoring families in terms of sensitivity, response time, cost-complexity and qualitative technology readiness. Integrated case studies (peptide-grafted films, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) with time-temperature integrators (TTIs), smart labels with active papers and battery-free near-field communication (NFC) systems) are critically assessed for scalability, cost-effectiveness, safety, and regulatory feasibility. The review concludes that low-cost visual indicators coupled to simple active functions are closest to near-term deployment, while sensor- and biosensor-based systems remain at prototype level. Future work must prioritize marker- and species-specific validation, safe and scalable material systems, techno-economic evaluation, and early integration of regulatory and consumer aspects to justify industrial adoption in aquatic supply chains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.