ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
SAFE_DTx: Safety-First Framework for AI-Driven Personalization in Digital Therapeutics.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as evidence-based software interventions, but current AI-driven personalization approaches lack dedicated safety-focused frameworks and face challenges due to scarce long-term outcome data and unpredictable model behaviors. We propose SAFE_DTx, a safety-first architectural framework for DTx that integrates well-established principles of predictive modeling and constrained decision-making to prioritize patient safety. SAFE_DTx's 2-module architecture comprises an AI feedback prediction module that forecasts short-term patient responses and a constrained planning module that selects the next intervention under explicit safety constraints. By decoupling these components and enforcing clear safety guardrails, the framework enables dynamic, real-time adaptation to individual patient feedback while staying within evidence-based safety limits. This modular design also enhances transparency in the decision-making process, and an in silico evaluation demonstrates its preliminary architectural feasibility, showing greater engagement and no safety violations compared to baseline strategies within the simulated environment. SAFE_DTx's safety-by-design architecture aligns with emerging regulatory emphasis on AI transparency and patient safety. It directly addresses key clinical challenges in AI-driven DTx personalization by ensuring that tailored interventions do not compromise patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.