Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789761›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN ANIMAL NUTRITION: The evolution of large language models and their impact on animal sciences.

Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid rise of large language models (LLM) is reshaping the scientific landscape, transitioning from early statistical language models to advanced transformer-based architectures capable of synthesizing knowledge across disciplines. While their predictive capacity and scalability have opened new avenues in data analysis, hypothesis generation, and decision support, concerns remain regarding bias, hallucination, reproducibility, and ethical governance. In animal sciences, LLM are gradually applied to challenges in nutrition modeling, animal health, genetic selection, and sustainability. Precision nutrition has benefited from LLM-driven synthesis of feed and metabolic data, enabling individualized feeding strategies and improved resource efficiency. In animal health, domain-specific systems have demonstrated applications in diagnostics and epidemiological monitoring. LLM is augmenting genomic analyses to accelerate marker discovery and breeding optimization, while sustainability efforts employ them to model greenhouse gas emissions, feed additives, and adaptation to climatic stressors. Notably, decision-support platforms demonstrate how domain-specialized LLM can bridge mechanistic knowledge with predictive analytics, enhancing knowledge transfer and empowering livestock producers. However, risks associated with overreliance, recursive reuse of LLM outputs in model development, and pseudo-expertise underscore the critical importance of human oversight. Unlike mechanistic models, which embed biological causality, LLM are entirely data-driven and may confidently propagate errors if trained on ill-conditioned datasets. Responsible use requires transparent reporting, validation, and bias auditing, with domain-specific fine-tuning. Open-source models can enhance reproducibility and trust, but they also raise financial and security concerns. LLM must be guided by transparency, accountability, and fairness to ensure they complement, rather than replace, human expertise. By advancing inquiry and livestock management, LLM hold the potential to support sustainable food production systems if deployed responsibly. Rather than full training, most applications will rely on fine-tuning and augmentation, which are more sustainable and adaptable strategies. This review intends to promote critical literacy and responsible adoption of LLM in research, education, and livestock decision-support systems for animal scientists, nutrition modelers, and extension professionals.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimal Nutrition SciencesLarge Language ModelsAnimalsLivestockanimal sciencedecision-support systemsdomain-specific AIlarge language modelsprecision livestock nutritionsustainability

Identifiers

PMID42789761
PMCPMC13686757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.