ArticleScience advances2026
Population coding under the scale invariance of high-dimensional noise.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dimensional scale-invariant neural activity is ubiquitous across brain regions and species, but its implications for information coding remain unclear. Here, we ask how stimulus information in the high-dimensional activity of mouse V1 scales with neuron number: Does it saturate due to noise correlations or increase without bound as subpopulations grow? Contrary to previous reports, we find that leading noise components that scale linearly with population size, and thus can limit information, are not sufficiently aligned with the signal to impose a bound. This conclusion follows from two scale-invariant power-law properties of neuronal responses in mouse V1: the noise eigenspectrum and alignment of noise components with the signal. We show that population subsampling links the observed power-law exponents to information boundedness and that information scaling depends on the full eigenspectrum rather than its leading modes. Last, we prove that, under subsampling, information-limiting correlations, if present, are differential correlations. Our findings clarify how information scales in high-dimensional neuronal activity under scale-invariant noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.