ArticleScience advances2026
Optical microscopy predictions of focal recurrence in glioblastoma.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM) is disease recurrence that occurs in all patients despite resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. A critical challenge in GBM treatment is the management of recurrent disease for which no standard of care exists. Predicting the location of GBM recurrence may improve the efficiency of advanced-stage therapies. We present an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict the recurrence risk of unprocessed surgical tissues at initial resection. AI-informed label-free optical microscopy was used to generate a normalized tumor infiltration value (AI-infiltration) for optical images of samples taken from resection cavity margins. These values, in combination with clinical, radiographic, and molecular variables, were used to build a predictive model of focal recurrence. In a cohort of 80 patients, comprising 367 samples and 133,454 unique images, GBM infiltration was significantly higher in margin samples from recurrent sites (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.