ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Barriers in operating proactive source reduction informed by an early warning system for dengue prevention: A qualitative study from end-user perspectives in Vietnam.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDengue is a major vector-borne disease, with rising incidence driven by climate change, rapid urbanization, and increased international travel. Although early warning systems (EWSs) have shown promising predictive performance in endemic settings, limited evidence on implementation barriers from local end users hinders their integration into routine proactive vector control.
methodsA qualitative study with in-depth interviews was conducted with local end users, including local authorities, health practitioners, and health volunteers. A deductive approach utilizing a predefined conceptual framework was employed to code the verbatim transcripts. Inductive coding was subsequently incorporated to capture emerging concepts that were not represented in the initial framework. Thematic analysis was performed to analyse the collected data. To enhance the methodological rigor, interviews and coding were performed by multiple and diverse researchers from various academic and practice institutions, and the transcripts were validated through member checking with selected participants.
resultsThe lack of supportive policies, limited engagement from relevant stakeholders due to low familiarity with EWS concepts, and operational challenges were identified as critical barriers to implementing EWS-informed proactive source reduction. The perception that dengue risks were only during the rainy season, together with socio-economic constraints, water scarcity exacerbated by extreme weather events, and the application of inappropriate source reduction measures, further constrained household participation. The multi-level barriers collectively disrupted the translation of EWS alerts into proactive dengue prevention.
conclusionsEarly warning information alone is insufficient to translate into effective and sustained proactive vector control for dengue prevention. Strengthening enabling policies, local stakeholder and community engagement, and awareness of EWS-informed risk management across multiple levels are essential to translate EWS alerts into timely and sustained vector control actions in dengue-endemic settings similar to Vietnam. Further studies across diverse settings are needed to assess the broader applicability of EWS-informed approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.