ArticlePLOS global public health2026
How can complex interventions be adapted to context? A qualitative analysis of the implementation of DREAMS in three Kenyan settings.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Kenya, the DREAMS Partnership ("Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe") aims to reduce new HIV cases among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW; aged 10-24) through a comprehensive programme of interventions. The impact of DREAMS varies across settings but reasons for this are not well understood. One potential reason is the differential implementation of DREAMS interventions due to on-the-ground adaptations made by implementers. We sought to understand if, how, and why DREAMS delivery was adapted in three Kenyan settings, so that complex interventions like DREAMS can be tailored to diverse contexts and challenges.We analysed 40 transcripts from individual and group discussions with DREAMS implementing teams. Data were collected between 2017-2019 in rural Gem and two Nairobi informal settlements. Using both FRAME and CFIR frameworks, we identified programming and contextual challenges that affected implementation, local adaptations made in response to these realities and challenges, and the goals and reasoning for adaptation. Reasons for adapting DREAMS were similar across settings yet the type of adaptation varied by context. Adaptations were made to: 1) improve programme attendance; 2) tailor content to better suit AGYW, encourage programme attendance and address community concerns; 3) support participants' wellbeing, amidst poverty, hunger and violence; and 4) cope with insufficient programming resources. Given their close contact with participants and families, DREAMS mentors often developed unique context-specific strategies to make interventions more appealing and accessible to participants of different ages and circumstances. Understanding shared reasons for adaptation across settings can help anticipate challenges before implementation, and inform the co-design of interventions with communities. As context-specific issues inevitably arise during implementation, mentors can be instrumental in adapting DREAMS, serving as a bridge between programme implementers and beneficiaries. Supporting mentors' ideas and ongoing commitment can ensure that those delivering programmes plan, learn, adapt and improve in partnership with communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.