ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Decomposing response inhibition: A POMDP model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhibitory control is a core cognitive function whose competence varies across the population, with impairments often observed in psychiatric conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The Stop Signal Task (SST) is a widely used paradigm for assessing this ability. However, conventional formalizations of SST performance, such as the independent race model, rely on assumptions that are frequently violated in modern experimental designs. Furthermore, they typically fit only mean reaction times, overlooking crucial trial-by-trial dynamics. To address these limitations, we formalize the SST as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). This framework characterizes inhibitory control with two components: noisy perceptual inference regarding stimuli and optimal control balanced against potential costs. To fit this model to the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study baseline cohort (N = 3,567), we introduce Transformer-encoded Simulation-Based Inference (TeSBI). This end-to-end architecture learns compact, sequence-aware embeddings from raw behavioral data. It enables efficient, amortized inference of individual-level posteriors. Extensive validation confirms it extracts reliable and identifiable parameters. We identify distinct latent computational attributes associated with scores on ADHD questionnaires. Controlling for sex, IQ, and medication status, children with higher ADHD scores exhibit subtle but robust shifts in computational attributes. They show a reduction in go cue directional precision, alongside a blunted sensitivity to stop error, go error and time costs. The learned embedding space reveals a continuous manifold in which children with higher ADHD scores are heterogeneously distributed, rather than forming distinct disorder clusters. This indicates that similar clinical characteristics can emerge from diverse combinations of computational mechanisms, supporting a dimensional perspective on neurodiversity. Our end-to-end framework can be extended to a broader range of cognitive tasks. It offers a scalable, theory-driven solution for analyzing large-scale behavioral data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.