Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789590›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2026

Invisibility, hypervisibility, relational visibility, and collective adaptation: inuit experiences of disability.

Chaneesa Rose Ryan, Nicole Diakite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chaneesa Rose RyanNunavummi Disabilities Makinnasuaqtiit Society, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8928-7399
Nicole DiakiteNunavummi Disabilities Makinnasuaqtiit Society, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disability is increasingly understood as a socially and culturally situated experience shaped by relationships, environments, and systems of recognition. However, limited research has examined how disability is perceived and experienced within Inuit communities. This paper draws on a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews with 126 Nunavummiut across 12 communities in Nunavut, conducted as part of a community-led study by Nunavummi Disabilities Makinnasuaqtiit Society. Guided by Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and the Piliriqatigiinniq Research Model, the analysis explores how disability becomes visible, recognized, and responded to within Inuit social contexts. Findings reveal that disability is not experienced as a fixed or visible category but emerges through four dynamics: (1) invisibility as social and structural absence, (2) hypervisibility as exposure, (3) relational visibility through belonging and contribution, and (4) collective adaptation as shared responsibility. These dynamics show how disability shifts between institutional systems of diagnosis and relational community contexts of participation. The study highlights a central tension between structural invisibility, reinforced by limited services and colonial systems of classification, and relational inclusion, enacted through kinship networks and collective care practices. Findings challenge deficit-based models and support culturally grounded, community approaches to policy and service delivery. The study contributes to discussions of disability as culturally and relationally shaped.

Indexed as

InuitPersons with DisabilitiesAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansInterviews as TopicNunavutQualitative ResearchSocial GroupdifferencedisabilityhypervisibilityInuitinvisibilityrelationality

Identifiers

PMID42789590
PMCPMC13618109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.