ArticlePloS one2026
Biometric verification using oral acoustic reflections.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biometric verification methods, such as voice, face, iris and fingerprint verification, are commonly used in smartphones, security systems, and medical devices. However, each involves tradeoffs in cost, accuracy, latency and susceptibility to spoofing. We present and report laboratory testing of Oral Cavity Acoustic Verification (OCAV), a biometric verification system that transmits sound waves into the user's oral cavity, characterizes the acoustic response, and returns a verification decision by comparing the acoustic response to the individual's prerecorded acoustic signature. A total of 108 healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years were recruited, and a unique acoustic profile was created for each participant. Across three recording sessions conducted one week apart, 20,860 genuine trials and 18,880 impostor trials were collected to evaluate verification accuracy. Verification accuracy was 90.1% for a single trial and 95.2% when pooling 5 consecutive trials. Unlike voice biometrics that depend on speech production and are sensitive to acoustic noise and audio playback attacks, OCAV exploits an active acoustic response from the oral cavity that may be less vulnerable to spoofing attacks. In contrast to other audio-based systems such as ear-canal acoustic biometrics, OCAV is intended for devices that already involve oral cavity contact. The potential applications include inhaler-based health monitoring, breath-alcohol tests, and the enforcement of nicotine-use restrictions. These capabilities can help support public health and safety efforts; for example, by monitoring youth access to e-vaping or detecting drivers' alcohol consumption prior to ignition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.