Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789537›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Asthma Intervention with Residential Ventilation and Air Cleaner (AIRVAC) Study: A 4-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial protocol.

Insung Kang, Semi Park, Yidan Zhang, Steven Tanner McCullough, Tia LaFavor, Yike Shen, June Young Park

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Insung KangDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-8950
Semi ParkDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Yidan ZhangDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Steven Tanner McCulloughDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Tia LaFavorRebuilding Together North Texas, Plano, Texas, United States of America.
Yike ShenDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
June Young ParkDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence linking exposure to airborne particulate and gaseous pollutants, as well as mold spores, with asthma control and severity is well established. A growing body of literature has demonstrated that ventilation and air filtration can improve indoor air quality (IAQ); however, clinical evidence on their comparative health impacts remains limited. Therefore, this trial aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of energy recovery ventilators (ERVs) and portable air cleaners (PACs) in reducing indoor air pollutants and mold levels and improving health outcomes in individuals with asthma. Secondary objectives includes associations between housing conditions, occupant behaviors, indoor environmental exposures, and asthma-related health outcomes.

methodsThe AIRVAC study is a single-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, with a pre-intervention period of up to 1 year and a 1-year post-intervention period. Children aged 5-17 years and adults with physician-diagnosed asthma will be recruited from more than 80 households across the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) area in Texas. Following the pre-intervention period, each household will be randomized to receive one of four different interventions midway through the study: (1) active ERVs, (2) sham ERVs, (3) active PACs, and (4) sham PACs. Primary health outcomes include asthma control; secondary outcomes include pulmonary function, asthma-related quality of life, stress, and sleep quality. Initial housing assessments will be conducted prior to the pre-intervention period to characterize occupant behaviors and housing-related factors that may contribute to asthma exacerbations and affect ERV installation. Environmental exposures will be assessed by combining measurements of indoor and outdoor air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as well as temperature, relative humidity, and indoor and outdoor mold, using low-cost and research-grade air quality sensors and mold sampling methods. DISCUSSION: Findings from the AIRVAC study will provide important evidence on the comparative effects of residential ventilation and air cleaning interventions on IAQ, mold, and asthma-related health outcomes among children and adults with asthma. The study will also examine the relationships among housing characteristics, occupant behaviors, indoor environmental exposures, and asthma-related health outcomes, while providing insights into the operation and performance of residential ventilation and air cleaning interventions in vulnerable households.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorAsthmaVentilationAdolescentAir FiltersChildChild, PreschoolHousingHumansSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID42789537
PMCPMC13614560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.