ArticlePloS one2026
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for organizational and system-level functions in primary health care: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary health care (PHC) is the cornerstone of health systems worldwide, yet faces growing pressures from aging populations, workforce shortages, and constrained resources. While artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used for clinical tasks such as diagnostics and decision support, their potential to address organizational and system-level processes remains underexplored. This scoping review maps AI and ML applications targeting non-clinical, organizational, and system-level functions in PHC, examining techniques employed, application purposes, data sources, and implementation maturity, and identifying evidence gaps to inform future research.
methodsThis scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. We will search Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library (Wiley), Ovid PsycINFO, and IEEE Xplore, as well as grey literature sources, from January 2010 to December 2025, with a pre-submission update. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts. Eligible studies include empirical research describing, evaluating, implementing, or developing AI and ML applications at the meso-level (organizational, e.g., care scheduling, population stratification) and macro-level (system-wide, e.g., workforce planning, funding allocation) of PHC. Studies on micro-level clinical applications, non-empirical research, and secondary literature will be excluded. Applications will be classified using a two-layer taxonomy (AI technique family and core algorithm) and mapped to PHC building blocks adapted from WHO operational frameworks. Synthesis will examine technique-building block intersections, application purposes, data sources, implementation maturity, and evidence gaps. The protocol is registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/wzj5x).
conclusionsThis review will provide a timely synthesis of AI and ML applications at organizational and system levels of PHC, identifying which building blocks have been addressed, which remain underexplored, and where the field stands in terms of implementation readiness. The findings will inform a targeted research agenda and provide actionable evidence for decision-makers seeking to leverage AI and ML for PHC strengthening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.