ArticlePloS one2026
Loneliness and all-cause mortality in the United States.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceLoneliness affects more than half of US adults and has been declared a public health epidemic, yet whether clinically documented loneliness independently predicts mortality across diverse populations remains unclear.
objectiveTo examine the association between clinically documented loneliness and all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, overall and by sex, race and ethnicity, and age.
methodsWe conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising electronic health record data from 65 health care organizations. Adults aged 18-90 years with at least one clinical encounter between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were eligible. Patients with a clinically documented diagnosis of loneliness were matched 1:1 (n = 28,944 per group) on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and 12 comorbidity domains to comparison patients with outpatient engagement and no loneliness diagnosis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. Between-group differences were assessed using risk differences, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models, overall and across prespecified subgroups.
resultsAmong 57,888 matched adults (mean age, 55.4 years; 62.9% female), loneliness was associated with increased mortality at every horizon: 1-year hazard ratio (HR), 1.52 (95% CI, 1.40-1.66); 3-year HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.27-1.43); and 5-year HR, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22-1.35). Absolute survival gaps widened from 1.57 to 2.82 percentage points. The largest 1-year relative excess occurred among male patients (HR, 1.85) and Hispanic patients (risk ratio, 2.33). Black patients had the greatest 3-year absolute gap (2.49 percentage points). Working-age adults showed sustained excess hazard across all windows (HR, 1.34-1.42), whereas older adults had the largest 1-year absolute gap (2.28 percentage points) with convergence by 5 years.
conclusionClinically documented loneliness was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, with the burden varying by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. These findings identify loneliness as a measurable, independent mortality risk marker and suggest that routine screening and targeted psychosocial intervention warrant prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.