Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789264›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Remote Services, Benefits, and Program Retention Changes Among Young Children in WIC.

Erica L Kenney, Matthew M Lee, Rebecca S Mozaffarian, Eric B Rimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erica L KenneyDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew M LeeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca S MozaffarianDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric B RimmDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) improves health for young children with low household incomes, but it is underutilized after infancy due to program complexity and lower perceived value of benefits for participants aged 1 to 4 years. Increasing participants' retention in WIC could be an important strategy for improving the health of young children. Objective: To evaluate whether policies making WIC easier to use and increasing benefit value were associated with increased retention of participants postinfancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional experiment used interrupted time series analysis of Massachusetts participants in WIC younger than 4 years enrolled between January 2017 and December 2022. Analyses were conducted in between June 2024 and April 2025. Exposures: Two policy changes: (1) the introduction of remote WIC services (March 2020) and (2) an increased cash-value benefit for fruits and vegetables, or cash value benefit (June 2021). Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly likelihood of postinfancy retention in WIC for children, calculated by counting all children younger than 4 years with active WIC certifications each month and dividing by the total number of children who had been certified as infants and stratifying by child age. The secondary outcome was the likelihood of retention plus redeeming any food package benefits. Results: There were 238 482 WIC-participating children across the study period. In the baseline year (105 782 children), the mean (SD) age was 17.0 (14.0) months, half the sample were female (52 505 [50%]). After remote services were implemented, a previously downward monthly trend in retention reversed, steadily increasing each month afterwards, by 1.04 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 0.48-1.60 pp) for children aged 12 to 23 months, 1.47 pp (95% CI, 1.06-1.87 pp) for children aged 24 to 35 months, and 1.25 pp (95% CI, 0.79-1.72 pp) for children aged 36 to 47 months. The increased cash value benefit (June 2021) was not associated with changes in retention trends overall, but was associated with immediate increases in the likelihood of retention plus benefit usage among children aged 12 to 23 months and 24 to 35 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional study, making remote WIC services available was associated with more children staying enrolled. Policy efforts to make remote service options permanent may support WIC utilization.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMassachusettsPoverty

Identifiers

PMID42789264
PMCPMC13615473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.