ReviewObesity surgery2026
Association Between Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and Melanoma Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been associated with a reduced incidence of various cancers. Yet, its potential impact on melanoma, the most lethal form of skin cancer, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore associations between MBS and melanoma risk. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies that compared MBS to non-MBS patients and reported the incidence of melanoma in both groups up to December 2025. The primary outcome was the risk of developing melanoma. A restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Ten studies were included, encompassing 2,310,128 patients, of whom 445,947 (19.3%) underwent MBS. The overall incidence of melanoma was 0.11% in the MBS group (516 / 445,947) and 0.24% (4,498 / 1,864,181) in the control group. Slightly lower melanoma risk was observed in the MBS group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.16; p = 0.222; I² = 85%). By synthesizing the largest body of evidence to date and focusing on melanoma as the primary outcome, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the association. Considering the rarity of the outcome, the substantial heterogeneity, and the very low certainty of evidence from observational studies, further large-scale studies are warranted to better define the association between MBS and melanoma risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.