ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Delta
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUnilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) can be cured through adrenalectomy. We developed a
methodsA total of 359 patients with PA who underwent dual-time-phase (10 min and 40 min)
resultsAmong the eight radiomics models, the XGBoost model achieved the best classification performance and was selected for the final model. Among the three PET models, the delta PET model yielded the highest area under the curve in the training set (0.875; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.814-0.935), validation set (0.861; 95% CI 0.754-0.968), and external test set (0.860; 95% CI 0.773-0.946). The combined clinical-radiomics model showed superior area under the curve values: 0.926 (95% CI 0.891-0.962) in training, 0.909 (95% CI 0.836-0.983) in validation, and 0.919 (95% CI 0.855-0.982) in external testing. The combined model outperformed the PET/CT model across all datasets and demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility.
conclusionThe model incorporating delta
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.