SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Fasting-induced metabolic reprogramming as a therapeutic vulnerability in cancer: a systematic mechanistic review of in vitro evidence.
Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fasting and fasting-mimicking interventions have emerged as promising metabolic strategies in oncology. While preclinical evidence suggests enhanced tumor sensitivity to therapy, the mechanistic basis of fasting-induced anticancer effects remains incompletely defined. To systematically evaluate and synthesize in vitro evidence investigating the molecular and metabolic impact of fasting-based interventions on cancer cell models. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies investigated fasting-mimicking conditions, serum starvation or nutrient restriction in cancer cell lines. Risk of bias was assessed across predefined methodological domains. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Across diverse tumor types, fasting conditions consistently reduced IGF-1 signaling, inhibited PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, suppressed glycolysis, and induced AMPK-mediated stress responses. Cancer cells exhibited impaired proliferative capacity and increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents under nutrient restriction. Despite methodological heterogeneity, mechanistic convergence across independent models was notable. Fasting induces a coordinated metabolic reprogramming that exposes intrinsic anabolic dependencies of malignant cells. These findings support the concept of fasting as a systems-level metabolic vulnerability strategy and warrant standardized translational investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.