ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Patient narratives in an online hernia peer-support community: a qualitative netnographic analysis.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to explore how individuals with hernia engage with online peer-support communities and how their shared narratives reflect the experience of living with and seeking treatment for hernia.
methodsA qualitative netnographic approach was employed, analysing posts from a large online hernia support group with approximately 8,500 members across more than 10 countries. The group was selected following scoping of alternative online communities because of its size, activity, heterogeneity, and public accessibility. A purposive sample of 26 high-engagement discussion threads comprising 936 comments was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, involving iterative familiarisation, inductive coding, theme development, and refinement. Saturation was monitored throughout, and data collection concluded when no new dominant themes were identified.
resultsFour inductively derived themes were identified: Surgical Experiences and Outcomes, Patient Concerns and Fears, Healthcare System and Access, and Coping and Support. Narratives described mesh-related anxiety, fear of recurrence, mistrust in healthcare providers, structural barriers to care, body-image concerns, and uncertainty surrounding treatment and recovery. Mesh discussions included concerns about safety, long-term complications, and living with an implanted material, alongside positive experiences of mesh repair. Participants also demonstrated active health-information-seeking behaviours, including peer validation, appraisal of surgical options, and self-advocacy. A visual summary of findings is included (see accompanying infographic).
conclusionOnline patient narratives offer rich insight into the lived experience of hernia and demonstrate how peer communities contribute to information seeking, support, and treatment-related discussion. These exploratory findings identify issues relevant to patient-centred communication and future outcomes research and suggest value in recognising the digital patient as an active information-seeker and co-producer of meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.