ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Intravascular imaging in myocardial infarction and ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries.
Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and angina or ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA) are heterogeneous syndromes that cannot be adequately characterized by coronary angiography alone. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) identifies thrombus, plaque disruption, and other superficial coronary abnormalities, whereas intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) better characterizes plaque burden, positive remodeling, intramural hematoma, and myocardial bridging. Their roles differ between acute and chronic presentations. In MINOCA, targeted intracoronary imaging during the index angiogram helps identify an acute epicardial mechanism, whereas early cardiac magnetic resonance characterizes myocardial injury, localizes the affected territory, and excludes nonischemic mimics. In ANOCA/INOCA, coronary function testing remains central to identifying vasospastic and microvascular endotypes. Structural findings such as layered plaque, intraplaque hemorrhage, fibroatheroma, or myocardial bridging vary in their mechanistic significance and should not be assumed to represent the cause of the index event solely on the basis of morphology. Territorial myocardial concordance strengthens their association with the involved coronary territory but does not by itself establish causality. We review the complementary roles of OCT and IVUS, examine differences in diagnostic yield among contemporary MINOCA studies, and propose a framework for interpreting intracoronary imaging findings in MINOCA in the context of myocardial and functional information. This approach aims to improve consistency in the interpretation and reporting of intracoronary imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.