ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The role of singleton salience in second-order suppression.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To process the various stimuli in the real world effectively, it is essential to suppress salient distractions. Recent studies employing majority search paradigms found that people can suppress the capture of salient color singleton distractors even without knowing their color, which proved that suppressing a salient singleton was not only based on first-order information (e.g., a specific color) but also on second-order features (e.g., a unique color) or global salience information (e.g., a feature singleton). However, it remains unknown whether variations in salience influence the attention suppression effect in the higher-order suppression mechanism. In the current study, we explored the effect of salience on suppression by adopting the majority search paradigm and varying the singleton salience in different ways (set size, color contrast, and luminance contrast). Across four experiments, Experiment 1 showed that manipulating relative singleton salience through set size did not affect higher-order suppression, as reflected by comparable search facilitation across set sizes. Experiments 2 and 3 employed the capture-probe paradigm and demonstrated that participants can proactively suppress singleton distractors based on second-order salience. Experiment 4 employed a psychophysical oddball detection task to further validate the effectiveness of the salience manipulation and used eye tracking to examine whether oculomotor suppression differed between high- and low-salience singleton distractors. Furthermore, by manipulating the luminance contrast of singletons, participants had a stronger suppression effect on low-salience singletons compared to high-salience singletons. We concluded that the level of salience is a potential factor in influencing the attentional suppression effect. OPEN PRACTICES STATEMENT: The materials and datafiles of this article have been publicly available at https://osf.io/f9qd8 . This study's design and hypotheses were preregistered at https://osf.io/fk8jy .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.