Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789067›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Spinal metastases: perioperative and oncological outcomes after separation surgery versus expanded anterior column resection: a retrospective cohort study.

Gan Xu, Hao Yuan, PengRu Wang, ShangBin Zhou, YongXin Mao, JianRu Xiao, Wei Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gan XuNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
Hao YuanNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
PengRu WangNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
ShangBin ZhouNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
YongXin MaoNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
JianRu XiaoNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China. jianruxiao83@163.com.
Wei XuNaval Military Medical University, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China. xuwei_spine@163.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare perioperative outcomes and assess associations of surgical approach with overall survival (OS) and composite local recurrence after separation surgery (SS) versus expanded anterior column resection (EACR) for spinal metastases.

methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort included 167 patients treated from August 2018 to August 2021 (SS, n = 50; EACR, n = 117). Follow-up ended at death, last contact, or December 31, 2024. OS was modeled using multivariable Cox regression and propensity-score overlap weighting. Composite local recurrence (radiographic regrowth or recurrent level-specific neurological symptoms) was modeled using Fine-Gray regression with death as a competing event.

resultsCompared with SS, EACR was associated with greater blood loss (1388.9 vs 1055.0 mL; P = 0.006), longer operative time (296.5 vs 255.3 min; P < 0.001), and greater 48-hour drainage (297.9 vs 228.0 mL; EACR, n = 116; P = 0.008). Median OS was 17 months after EACR and 13 months after SS (log-rank P = 0.326). For SS versus EACR, the adjusted mortality hazard ratio was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.76), and the overlap-weighted estimate was 1.12 (95% CI 0.55-2.26). The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for composite local recurrence was 0.74 (bootstrap 95% CI 0.33-1.51).

conclusionsSS was associated with a lower perioperative burden, with no significant differences in adjusted OS or composite local recurrence compared with EACR. More extensive tumor resection may not necessarily provide additional benefit and should be weighed against the increased surgical burden.

Indexed as

Expanded anterior column resectionLocal recurrenceOverall survivalSeparation surgerySpinal metastases

Identifiers

PMID42789067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.