ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Reference values for PSA, PSA density, and MRI prostate volume in healthy German men.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish stratified normative reference values for MRI-derived prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and PSA density (PSAD) in German men with no known prostate pathologies, accounting for age, body-mass index, and height. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included men from the prospective population-based Study of Health in Pomerania, Germany, with 10 years of follow-up. Men with diagnosed prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or lower urinary tract symptoms were excluded to derive reference values unaffected by disease or interventions. PV and PSAD were obtained from pelvic MRI using deep-learning segmentation. In a test set, segmentation-derived volumes were compared with manual PVs. PV, PSA, and PSAD were modeled using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS).
resultsOut of 1696 men, 1037 were analyzed (median age 46.00 years [IQR 38.00-56.00]). Median PV was 31.29 mL (5th-95th: 20.74-51.39), PSA 0.81 ng/mL (0.32-2.79), and PSAD 0.025 ng/mL² (0.011-0.071). PV and PSA increased progressively with age, whereas PSAD showed greater age-stability, peaking at 71 years, plateauing until 75, and then declining. Age-adjusted PSAD never exceeded 0.11 ng/mL², unlike PSA, which rose continuously. Body-mass index correlated positively with PV but inversely with PSAD; PSA showed a negative association with height.
conclusionThis study provides reference values and percentile curves for PV, PSA, and PSAD in men without prostate disease, along with an open-access calculator. PSAD showed age-stability, contrasting with continuously rising PSA. These reference values may help distinguish normal from pathological prostatic variation across age strata and inform PSAD thresholds in screening programs. KEY POINTS: Question Population-based reference values with long-term follow-up for PV, PSA, and PSAD are lacking, limiting the distinction between normal variation and disease-related changes. Findings Among 1037 men without prostate disease, 95th percentiles were: PV 51.39 mL, PSA 2.79 ng/mL, and PSAD 0.071 ng/mL². PSAD remained below 0.11 ng/mL² across all age ranges. Clinical relevance MRI-based percentiles for PV and PSAD may help identify normal variation, reducing unnecessary evaluations while supporting early detection of abnormalities. An open-access calculator enables personalized assessment for clinical and research purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.