Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42789022›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026

Adaptation and initial psychometric validation of the Latvian version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR45 in women with breast cancer.

Ingrida Trups-Kalne, Laura Nesaule, Lauma Springe, Lubova Tihomirova, Vita Steina, Viktorija Pacukevica-Stope, Laura Rotberga, Jelena Maksimenko, Arvids Irmejs, Elita Poplavska

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ingrida Trups-KalnePsychology Laboratory, Institute of Public Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia. Ingrida.Trups-Kalne@rsu.lv.
Laura NesauleInstitute of Public Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Lauma SpringeInstitute of Public Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Lubova TihomirovaInstitute of Public Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Vita SteinaInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Viktorija Pacukevica-StopeInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Laura RotbergaInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Jelena MaksimenkoInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Arvids IrmejsInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Elita PoplavskaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

Project "Internal consolidation of RSU and external consolidation of RSU with LSPA" (No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/005) and is financed within the framework of the European Union Recovery and Resilience plan and the state budget No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo culturally adapt and initially evaluate the psychometric properties of the Latvian versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and breast cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR45 in women with breast cancer.

methodsThe study was conducted within a pilot project implementing the ICHOM Breast Cancer Standard Set in a specialised university hospital in Latvia. Translation and cultural adaptation followed the EORTC procedure and included expert review and cognitive debriefing. Psychometric evaluation used baseline data from 142 women and six-month follow-up data from 47. Analyses included item-level indicators, internal consistency, multitrait scaling, inter-scale correlations, correlations with the Stress Symptom Scale, and paired change analyses. Conditional QLQ-BR45 items were treated as structurally missing when not applicable.

resultsExpert review and cognitive debriefing supported linguistic, conceptual, and cultural appropriateness. Reliability and item-scale correspondence were acceptable for several domains, with particularly strong multitrait scaling results for QLQ-BR45 Body Image, Sexual Functioning, and Breast Symptoms. Correlations between EORTC functioning and symptom domains and the Stress Symptom Scale were generally in the hypothesised directions. Six-month findings showed clinically plausible changes in functioning and treatment-related symptoms, but estimates were based on a smaller follow-up sample and reduced valid samples for some conditional scales.

conclusionThe Latvian EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR45 showed acceptable preliminary psychometric performance. The findings provide initial support for their use to assess HRQoL and breast cancer-specific symptoms in Latvia, while larger multicentre and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate additional measurement properties and responsiveness.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPsychometricsQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansLatviaMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerEORTC QLQ-BR45EORTC QLQ-C30Health-related quality of lifePatient-reported outcome measuresValidation

Identifiers

PMID42789022
PMCPMC13614982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.