ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Endometrial echogenicity at insemination is associated with conception in primiparous Holstein cows.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Echotexture analysis of the bovine endometrium has been used to detect established pregnancy. It was asked instead whether echotexture at insemination is associated with that service's outcome. Forty-nine inseminations in 34 primiparous Holstein cows, free of endometritis and bred to one sire between Days 90 and 150 postpartum, were imaged transrectally on Days 0, 4, 12, 16, 18 and 21. Mean grey level (MGL), homogeneity and contrast were computed from the images. Pregnancy was confirmed on Day 35; 33 services succeeded and 16 did not. With cow as a random effect and service nested within cow, MGL was 9.84 units higher in services that succeeded (P = 0.001), and 10.01 units higher among first services alone (P < 0.001). Contrast differed in the same direction (P = 0.011) and homogeneity did not (P = 0.065). Neither measurement day nor its interaction with outcome was significant, and the difference was 14.3 units at insemination (P = 0.003). Discrimination was best on that day (area under the curve 0.755, 95% CI 0.61-0.90). In the 12 cows bred both unsuccessfully and successfully, each her own control, MGL was 9.86 units higher at the successful service (P < 0.001). Endometrial echogenicity is therefore better explained as a condition of the uterus at each service than as a fixed property of the cow. Because the reading is available before breeding, the finding identifies a candidate marker of uterine condition at service rather than a pregnancy test, and one needing validation in an independent cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42789002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.