ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Development and exploratory external assessment of a machine learning model for early delirium prediction in non-mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delirium is a common and severe complication of sepsis in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality and prolonged hospitalization. Early identification of high-risk individuals remains challenging, particularly among non-mechanically ventilated patients who are less frequently represented in prediction studies. Using routinely collected electronic health record data, we performed a retrospective multicenter study to establish and validate an early prediction model for delirium in non-mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis. Patients from the MIMIC-IV database were used for model development, and an independent cohort from the eICU Collaborative Research Database was used for exploratory external assessment. A total of 3,015 patients in the development cohort and 1,119 patients in the exploratory test cohort were included. Among the evaluated algorithms, XGBoost achieved the best discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.807 in internal validation. The eICU cohort contained only 10 delirium cases (incidence < 1%), forming a sparse-event dataset; although the XGBoost model yielded an AUC of 0.833 in this cohort, the calibration and decision curve analysis results should be interpreted with extreme caution due to limited positive events. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, higher illness-severity indices, exposure to sedative or analgesic agents, and metabolic disturbances such as elevated anion gap and abnormalities in hematocrit and calcium were the strongest contributors to prediction. These predictors align with recognized features of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction. This externally validated model may support early risk stratification and targeted preventive strategies in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.