Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42788897›Full record

Trial reportApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026

Self-control strategies to reduce meat consumption: An ecological momentary intervention.

Alice Elena Seffen, Laura Maria König, Simone Dohle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice Elena SeffenInstitute for Family Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-0814
Laura Maria KönigFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-8842
Simone DohleInstitute for Family Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-5464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of individuals aim to reduce their meat consumption, but implementing this is challenging. Self-control strategies could support this change; however, their effectiveness remains understudied. This study examines whether providing self-control strategies supports motivated individuals in reducing meat intake. Based on the process model of self-control, we tested whether situational strategies outperform intrapsychic strategies. Additionally, we examined whether combining both strategy types is more effective than either strategy alone. We conducted an ecological momentary intervention including a baseline (Week 1), an intervention (Weeks 2-4), and a follow-up (Week 9). Participants-156 German students who regularly consumed meat and aimed to reduce their consumption-were randomized to one of four groups: during the intervention, they received either no, intrapsychic, situational, or both strategies. Meat consumption (in grams) was measured through end-of-the-day reports. Two-part multilevel models showed that receiving strategies (vs. none) and receiving both strategy families (vs. one) increased the odds of meat-free meals during the intervention, but did not reduce overall meat consumption. All groups meaningfully reduced meat consumption during study participation, even up to the 1-month follow-up. Findings challenge the key prediction of the process model and inform the design of future diary interventions.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentFeeding BehaviorMeatSelf-ControlAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultecological momentary interventionmeatrandomized controlled trialself‐controlself‐regulationstrategy

Identifiers

PMID42788897
PMCPMC13614289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.