ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Survival of Patients With MBD4-Mutated Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The prognosis of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) remains poor, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show limited efficacy, with response rates typically below 5%. Tebentafusp, an immune therapy targeting the gp100 protein, is the first drug to improve overall survival (OS) in mUM. Somatic MBD4 deficiency induces a hypermutated phenotype in a fraction of UM cases and may predict benefit from ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with mUM carrying somatic or germline MBD4 alterations and treated with ICIs at Institut Curie (Paris, France). Clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Results: Twelve patients received ICIs (nine pembrolizumab, two ipilimumab + nivolumab, one pembrolizumab + lenvatinib). Most (83%) had M1a liver-only disease. The overall response rate was 50% (two complete, four partial) with a disease control rate of 83%. The median follow-up was 22 months (range, 9.9-116.8), and within this time frame median progression-free survival and OS were not reached. At 12 months, 73% of patients were progression free, and the estimated 2-year OS was 86%. Conclusions: We observed that, in patients with MBD4-mutated mUM, ICIs achieved a 50% response rate and prolonged survival, demonstrating strong and sustained clinical activity in this distinct molecular subgroup and exceeding outcomes reported with ICIs or tebentafusp. Translational Relevance: Our findings support further evaluation of MBD4 mutation as a predictive biomarker and suggest that ICIs should be considered as a preferred first-line option in MBD4-mutated mUM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.