ArticleeLife2026
Retinal curl as a functional signal for heading estimation beyond the focus of expansion.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prevailing models aiming at explaining heading assume that humans need to recover the Focus of Expansion (FoE) while accounting for eye-movement-induced rotation. We propose an alternative: the visual system utilizes mean retinal curl from fixations as a surrogate signal for heading, rendering the explicit recovery of the FoE unnecessary. Stationary participants viewed simulated walking paths on a large screen while fixating on points on the projected ground texture at varying eccentricities - a natural behavior inducing sustained retinal curl. Participants continuously reported perceived heading in 3D scene coordinates. To isolate the role of retinal curl, we employed a real-time manipulation that kept translational flow constant while the foveal curl component was either unaltered, canceled, or over-canceled. Under natural conditions (unaltered), participants exhibited systematic heading biases opposite the direction of gaze. Crucially, these biases vanished when we canceled the expected curl and flipped when we over-canceled it, identifying retinal curl as the specific driver of perceptual bias. We modeled these results using a simple feedback controller and a ring-attractor neural network featuring gaze-contingent inhibition and a 'straight-ahead' prior. These findings suggest that the brain exploits the geometry of gaze stabilization to simplify navigation, treating retinal curl as a functional signal rather than noise to be filtered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.