SynthesisInternational nursing review2026
Nursing Image Among Pre-Nursing Students: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review with Future Directions on Recruitment Strategies.
Synthesis in International nursing review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo synthesize existing evidence to inform targeted recruitment strategies and interventions.
backgroundThe ongoing global shortage of nurses presents a significant threat to healthcare delivery. Addressing this requires an understanding of why pre-nursing students choose to or avoid nursing as a career. A key deterrent is the profession's negative image, often associated with "dirty work." However, current literature lacks a comprehensive view of the factors shaping these perceptions.
methodsNine databases were searched from inception to October 2024. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs focusing on pre-nursing students' perceptions of nursing image. A five-stage framework analysis structured the findings, and Bronfenbrenner's social-ecological model categorized factors at individual, interpersonal, and societal levels. The JBI Convergent Integrated Method integrated qualitative findings and qualitized quantitative evidence according to these levels.
resultsThirty-two studies (9034 participants) from 14 countries were included. Individual-level factors included gender stereotypes, knowledge of the profession, perceived work attributes, and intrinsic motivation. Interpersonal-level factors included the role of family, peers, and exposure to nursing professionals. Societal-level factors included media portrayals, sociocultural norms, and targeted recruitment interventions.
conclusionFactors converge across levels, and passive visibility alone is insufficient to shift entrenched views. Post-COVID "hero" narratives may increase visibility but also reinforce associations with fatigue and difficult working conditions. Improving pre-nursing students' perceptions of nursing image requires sustained, coordinated, multilevel recruitment strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Educators and healthcare institutions may consider strategies that challenge gender stereotypes, engage parents and peers, provide structured exposure to nursing roles, and strengthen leadership-focused media portrayals. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Recruitment strategies should be supported by policy and aligned with efforts to address structural conditions that shape nursing image, with the ultimate goal of strengthening the future nursing workforce and as part of workforce planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.