ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Incorporating Intracoronary Lithotripsy into Daily Practice: A Temporal Comparative Analysis of Safety, Efficacy, and Learning Curve.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Learning Curve: Integrating Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy into Contemporary Calcium Modification.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a groundbreaking technology for treating calcified coronary lesions.
objectiveTo assess whether case selection and interventional performance with IVL have evolved over time after its incorporation into daily practice.
methodsWe prospectively included 104 consecutive patients with 127 calcified coronary lesions treated with IVL. The cohort was divided into two temporal groups (52 patients each) based on the order of patient inclusion. Clinical data and procedural performance were compared between the groups. All statistical tests were two-sided, with a significance level of 0.05.
resultsThe mean age was 73.2 ± 10.2 years, and 62.5% of patients presented with acute coronary syndromes. Severe calcification and type B2/C lesions were identified in 73.2% and 98.4%, respectively. Upfront IVL was performed in 92.9% of lesions, intravascular imaging was used in 78%, rotational atherectomy in 6.3%, and angiographic success was achieved in 96.0%. Compared with the first cohort, the latter cohort had more bifurcation lesions (60.0% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.04), more interventions in the circumflex artery (24.6% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.02), and a lower use of 4.0-mm diameter balloons (4.6% vs. 18.5%; p = 0.02). The latter cohort spanned a longer inclusion period (168 ± 90.8 vs. 120 ± 72.8 days; p = 0.004) and had fewer angiographic complications (1.5% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.01), whereas in-hospital major adverse cardiac events did not differ (3.8% vs. 5.8%; p = 1.0).
conclusionIVL is an effective modality for coronary calcium modification. Temporal changes in case selection and interventional performance may reflect a learning-adaptation curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.