ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
Invisible threats: environmental asbestos exposure and water contamination in a former mining area of Northeastern Brazil.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asbestos, a mineral fiber historically used in construction and industry due to its durability and resistance, is recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity through inhalation exposure. Although chrysotile asbestos was banned in Brazil in 2017, former mining areas remain major environmental liabilities, potentially sustaining long-term contamination of surrounding ecosystems. This study aimed to identify and characterize the qualitative presence of chrysotile asbestos fibers in surface waters and sediments in Bom Jesus da Serra, Bahia, Northeastern Brazil, where the São Félix mine operated for nearly three decades without subsequent remediation. Between August and November 2022, eight sampling sites were monitored across five field campaigns. Water and sediment samples were collected and analyzed for physicochemical parameters according to ABNT and CETESB standards, while asbestos fibers were detected and confirmed using phase-contrast microscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Chrysotile fibers were consistently detected in water and sediment samples from all sites, with higher accumulation in sediments, indicating persistent contamination of aquatic ecosystems. Most conventional water quality indicators complied with Brazilian standards. However, asbestos fibers were not quantified using regulatory metrics, preventing comparison with international guidelines and limiting exposure assessment. Their recurrent qualitative detection indicates environmental persistence and supports continued monitoring and future quantitative investigations to inform public health strategies in vulnerable communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.