ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Asthma Management.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto perform cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Asthma Management for Brazil.
methodsa psychometric study encompassing the stages of translation, translation synthesis, back-translation, expert committee submission, pre-final version testing, and adapted version testing. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were performed to analyze construct validity and reliability.
resultsthe Content Validity Index of the translated version was higher than 0.80, after modifications proposed by experts. Pre-final version testing indicated good comprehension and ease of response. The adapted version was tested on 143 teachers. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit to the model, with factor loadings between 0.555 and 0.911. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.922.
conclusionthe Brazilian version of the scale presented reliable and valid psychometric measures, confirming its unidimensionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.