ReviewMolecular medicine reports2026
BMAL1 in cardiovascular diseases: Molecular mechanisms, circadian regulation and translational perspectives (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain and muscle ARNT‑like 1 (BMAL1) is a core transcription factor of the molecular circadian clock and links daily timing with cardiovascular electrophysiology, metabolism, vascular function and inflammation. Altered BMAL1 expression or rhythmicity has been reported in arrhythmias, atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and heart failure. However, its specific role has remained elusive, as local effects in cardiovascular cells are often mixed with the broader effects of whole‑body circadian disruption. The present review addressed this gap by separating evidence from central and peripheral clocks, cell‑specific and systemic models, and experimental and human studies. Cardiomyocyte‑specific models provide relatively direct evidence that the local clock supports electrical stability, substrate use, mitochondrial homeostasis and contractile function. However, in endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells and immune cells, the effects of BMAL1 are more variable and depend on cell type, metabolic conditions, disease stage and circadian phase. Human evidence remains mainly associative, whereas most mechanistic findings come from cell and animal studies. The present review also assessed small‑molecule clock modulators, chronotherapy and non‑pharmacological interventions, as well as time‑resolved multi‑omics and machine‑learning approaches. Current evidence does not support viewing BMAL1 as simply protective or harmful. A selective BMAL1‑binding small molecule has recently been identified, but its cardiovascular efficacy and safety have not been established. In addition, the clinical benefits of chronotherapy vary across treatments and patients. Further translation will require tissue‑specific human models, repeated sampling across biological time and prospective studies of treatment guided by individual circadian phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.