ArticleNucleic acids research2026
DNA damage induces long range changes to duplex structure-a non-protein start to damage detection?
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA-binding proteins must quickly locate specific sites on DNA to enable replication, repair, and transcription. While sequence-specific recognition is well understood, the physical basis of structure-specific recognition remains unclear, limiting our understanding of DNA damage repair. Proteins must distinguish damaged sites within largely undamaged DNA; however, studying this is challenging due to DNA's dynamic nature. We hypothesized that DNA damage causes changes in DNA structure, signalling protein recruitment. Using confocal single-molecule FRET, we analysed five DNA duplexes containing modifications: ribonucleotide, 8-oxoguanine, an abasic site, a nick, and a gap, which are all involved in the base excision repair pathway. Each construct was measured with nine dye pairs in triplicate to capture changes in bending, twisting, and stretching. An automated analysis pipeline processed 162 measurements, enabling rigorous statistical comparisons. All modifications altered FRET efficiencies compared to undamaged DNA, including the subtlest change: a single oxygen difference (ribo- versus deoxyribonucleotide). Abasic sites, nicks, and gaps had the greatest effects. These findings provide direct evidence that DNA damage affects duplex structure and dynamics beyond the lesion site, suggesting DNA flexibility changes may act as an early signal for repair protein recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.