Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42788241›Full record

Trial reportNMR in biomedicine2026

Quantifying Pancreatic Fat Using a Free-Breathing Acquisition in Adults With Obesity Undergoing Diet-Induced Weight Loss-Results From the LION Study.

Philipp Braun, Christoph Zoellner, Mingming Wu, Robert Graf, Jonathan Stelter, Anna Reik, Hans Hauner, Jan Stefan Kirschke, Christina Holzapfel, Daniela Junker and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philipp BraunInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-7776
Christoph ZoellnerInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-010X
Mingming WuInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-7091
Robert GrafInstitute of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-3680
Jonathan StelterInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3335-3331
Anna ReikInstitute of Clinical Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-2994
Hans HaunerInstitute of Clinical Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan Stefan KirschkeInstitute of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-0003
Christina HolzapfelInstitute of Clinical Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-9338
Daniela JunkerInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-8485
Dimitrios C KarampinosInstitute of Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-3662

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01EA1709German Research Foundation 450799851German Research Foundation 455422993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A free-breathing six-echo radial stack-of-stars acquisition is evaluated as an alternative to Cartesian breath-hold scans for pancreatic fat quantification at 3T. Pancreatic fat deposition was assessed in 18 participants with obesity enrolled in a randomized controlled lifestyle intervention study (LION) using both a Cartesian breath-hold scan and a free-breathing high-resolution stack-of-stars sequence (scan times: 16 s vs. 2 min 55 s). Pancreatic segmentations were initially generated using the VibeSegmentator and subsequently refined manually to reduce the amount of included visceral fat. The Intra-observer reproducibility of the manual refinement was assessed after 3 months using Dice similarity score. SNR for both scan methods was quantified using a large water phantom. Mean segmented volume and mean pancreatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) values between radial and Cartesian scans were compared. PDFF and volume changes between baseline and post-intervention were investigated for both techniques. Segmented pancreatic volumes and PDFF measurements demonstrated excellent agreement between the radial and Cartesian sequences (Volume: R

Indexed as

Adipose TissueMagnetic Resonance ImagingObesityPancreasRespirationWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsfree‐breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)pancreatic fat depositionproton density fat fraction (PDFF)radial stack‐of‐stars

Identifiers

PMID42788241
PMCPMC13613249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.