Trial reportNMR in biomedicine2026
Quantifying Pancreatic Fat Using a Free-Breathing Acquisition in Adults With Obesity Undergoing Diet-Induced Weight Loss-Results From the LION Study.
Trial report in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A free-breathing six-echo radial stack-of-stars acquisition is evaluated as an alternative to Cartesian breath-hold scans for pancreatic fat quantification at 3T. Pancreatic fat deposition was assessed in 18 participants with obesity enrolled in a randomized controlled lifestyle intervention study (LION) using both a Cartesian breath-hold scan and a free-breathing high-resolution stack-of-stars sequence (scan times: 16 s vs. 2 min 55 s). Pancreatic segmentations were initially generated using the VibeSegmentator and subsequently refined manually to reduce the amount of included visceral fat. The Intra-observer reproducibility of the manual refinement was assessed after 3 months using Dice similarity score. SNR for both scan methods was quantified using a large water phantom. Mean segmented volume and mean pancreatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) values between radial and Cartesian scans were compared. PDFF and volume changes between baseline and post-intervention were investigated for both techniques. Segmented pancreatic volumes and PDFF measurements demonstrated excellent agreement between the radial and Cartesian sequences (Volume: R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.