ArticleSexual offending (Trier, Germany)2026
Prevention and Response Strategies for Sexual Violence in Indonesian State Universities: A Multi-Case Study.
Article in Sexual offending (Trier, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual violence in higher education has become a persistent institutional and legal problem in Indonesia, according to the Women's Commission, there were 45,069 reported cases in 2020, yet prevention and response mechanisms vary considerably across universities. This study examines the strategies used by Indonesian state universities to prevent and respond to sexual violence against women and identifies institutional gaps that limit their effectiveness. Using a descriptive qualitative case-study design, the research was conducted in state universities under the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis involving heads of centres for gender and child studies, PPKS task-force members, legal-aid officers, lecturers, students, and campus units responsible for sexual-violence prevention and response. The findings show that universities have developed multiple initiatives, including institutional regulations, standard operating procedures, PPKS task forces, gender and child study centres, complaint and legal-aid services, awareness programmes, peer-support groups, faculty-level focal points, and gender-responsive learning activities. Case-responding mechanisms generally include reporting, protection, assistance, sanctioning, and victim recovery through medical, psychological, legal, spiritual, and academic support. However, implementation remains uneven. Major weaknesses include limited transparency, insufficient case monitoring, inconsistent sanctions, weak coordination between campus units and external agencies, and institutional tendencies to prioritise reputation over victim-centred justice. The study contributes to policy discussions by offering a comparative account of campus-based prevention and response practices and by recommending stronger governance, clearer accountability, survivor-centred procedures, and integrated monitoring systems to ensure safer university environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.