ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
Clinical Efficacy of Arthroscopic Partial Wrist Arthrodesis: Comparative Analysis Across Wrist Pathologies and Fusion Techniques.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic partial wrist arthrodesis for various wrist pathologies, including Kienböck's disease, radiolunate (RL) arthritis, and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) or scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC), comparing different fusion techniques. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients treated by a single surgeon between October 2015 and November 2023. Procedures included scaphocapitate (SC) fusion for Kienböck's disease, RL fusion for RL arthritis, lunatocapitate (LC), or four-corner fusion (4CF) for SNAC/SLAC. Primary outcomes assessed were fusion rate, reoperation rate, wrist range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale pain scores, QuickDASH, and modified Mayo wrist scores. Results: Solid fusion was achieved in 100% of SC fusion and 4CF groups but was lower in RL (67%) and LC (43%) fusion groups. LC fusion had the highest reoperation rate (57%). Postoperatively, significant pain relief occurred across all groups. The LC group demonstrated notable ROM reduction (median from 100-degree preoperative to 70-degree postoperative, Conclusion: Arthroscopic partial wrist arthrodesis provides favorable outcomes, particularly in SC and 4CF procedures, with higher fusion rates, better motion preservation, and quicker healing compared with traditional open techniques. However, LC fusion is associated with higher complications and reduced functional outcomes, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.