ArticleOtology & neurotology open2026
Cochlear Implantation in Adults 65 Years and Older With Single-sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss.
Article in Otology & neurotology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cochlear implantation has proven success as a treatment for single sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) in children and adults. However, in adults 65 years and older, cochlear implantation for the treatment of SSD and AHL has been difficulty to study given the restrictions in insurance coverage for cochlear implants (CI) due to current Medicare guidelines. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients 65 years old and older who underwent cochlear implantation for SSD and AHL to provide data supporting a change in CI candidacy indications for Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: A cohort of CI recipients over the age of 65 years with either SSD (4-frequency pure tone average [4fPTA] ≥90 dB in the implanted ear and ≤30 dB in the better hearing ear) or AHL (interaural difference in 4fPTA ≥15 dB HL, better hearing ear 4fPTA >30 dB HL and ≤70 dB HL) was identified from a single tertiary-level CI center. Results: Forty CI recipients ≥65 years (9 SSD; 31 AHL) were identified. There were significant improvements (percentage point change, ∆%) demonstrated with CI use on consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores from baseline to 3 timepoints in both SSD (3 m, +38 ∆%; 6 m, +40 Δ%; 12 m, +47 Δ%) and AHL subjects (3 m, 40 Δ%; 6 m, +41 Δ%; 12 m, +42 Δ%). Significant improvements were also seen on AzBio sentences in quiet in both SSD (3 m, +67 Δ%; 6 m, +45 Δ%; 12 m, +68 Δ%) and AHL subjects (3 m, +44 Δ%; 6 m, +57 Δ%; 12 m, +54 Δ%). The status of the contralateral ear accounted for little variance in CNC improvement at 6 or 12 months. Moderate positive associations between device usage and CNC word and AzBio sentence testing were observed at 6 months. Conclusions: Outcomes in adults ≥65 years old with SSD and AHL who undergo CI support the use of implantation in Medicare beneficiaries and provide further evidence for ear-specific candidacy criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.