Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42788134›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Direct spinal cord injury during cervical epidural and nerve root blocks: A case series and pathophysiological reevaluation.

Sung Jin Kim, Young Jin Kim, In Ho Jung

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sung Jin KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.
Young Jin KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.
In Ho JungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical epidural and nerve root blocks effectively manage radicular pain but pose risks of severe neurologic complications, including acute myelopathy. Although vascular embolization of particulate steroids is often implicated in these events, direct mechanical spinal cord injury remains an underrecognized etiology. Identifying the true pathophysiologic mechanism is essential to prevent permanent neurological deficits. We retrospectively reviewed four patients who developed acute spinal cord injuries immediately following cervical nerve blocks or targeted acupuncture. We analyzed clinical presentations, intraprocedural events, and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings to elucidate the underlying mechanism of injury. All patients reported an instantaneous, excruciating "electric shock-like" sensation during needle insertion, followed immediately by severe motor weakness and paresthesia. MRI consistently revealed focal, central T2-weighted high signal intensities strictly localized within the spinal cord parenchyma. Unlike typical vascular infarctions following specific arterial territories, these findings strongly correlate with the physical trajectory of a direct needle puncture. The pathognomonic intraprocedural electric shock sensation and the central localization of MRI lesions strongly suggest direct mechanical needle injury as a primary cause of these catastrophic complications. Immediate cessation of needle advancement upon patient report of a shock-like sensation is critical to prevent irreversible spinal cord damage.

Indexed as

Cervical spinemyelopathynerve blockspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID42788134
PMCPMC13607912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.