Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42788115›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism

Bone Age in Endocrinology - Part 1: Methods of Bone Age Assessment.

Kiran K Golla, Eram Nahid, Rajesh Khadgawat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiran K GollaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Centre for Endocrinology Diabetes Obesity Thyroid (CEDOT), Vizag, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Eram NahidDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Rajesh KhadgawatDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age assessment is an essential competency for endocrinology residents, guiding the diagnosis and management of growth disorders, pubertal abnormalities and endocrine conditions. This review is presented in two parts: Part 1 focuses on the methods of bone age assessment, while Part 2 addresses its clinical utility and applications. The Greulich and Pyle (G&P) atlas is widely used for its simplicity, while the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) method offers a more detailed, scoring-based approach but requires more time. In younger children, proximal ossification centres are more informative, whereas distal centres are more informative in older adolescents. TW3 generally estimates slightly younger ages than TW2, and G&P tends to score younger than TW2. Emerging tools-such as automated image analysis, content-based image retrieval and ultrasonography-promise efficiency gains but face challenges of operator dependence and variable reliability. Advances like BoneXpert have improved standardization and reproducibility, yet traditional G&P and TW methods remain central in endocrine practice due to their accessibility, validated references and widespread familiarity.

Indexed as

Bone ageGreulich and Pyle methodTanner–Whitehouse methodX-ray left hand

Identifiers

PMID42788115
PMCPMC13609913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.