ReviewCureus2026
Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanism, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal catheter ablation modality that uses high-voltage, ultra-short electrical pulses to induce irreversible electroporation of cardiomyocyte membranes. Unlike radiofrequency and cryoballoon energy, PFA exploits differential electroporation thresholds across tissue types, producing lesions that are largely confined to the myocardium while sparing the esophagus, phrenic nerve, and pulmonary veins. Multiple pivotal trials and large multinational registries have now established PFA as an effective and safe alternative to thermal ablation for both paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), with freedom from atrial arrhythmia rates comparable to radiofrequency and cryoablation, and a distinct, energy-specific complication profile. Notable adverse events unique to PFA include transient coronary artery vasospasm, intravascular hemolysis with rare acute kidney injury, and microbubble-related embolic risk, while classic thermal complications, such as atrioesophageal fistula and pulmonary vein stenosis, have shown a markedly reduced observed incidence across large cohorts. This review summarizes the biophysical mechanism of PFA, synthesizes clinical trial and registry evidence for paroxysmal and persistent AF, details the energy-specific safety profile, and outlines emerging applications, including posterior wall isolation, ventricular arrhythmia ablation, and next-generation catheter design. As PFA adoption accelerates, understanding both its favorable safety profile and its unique failure modes is essential for electrophysiologists integrating this technology into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.