ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Mapping compassion from others: a mixed-methods research protocol on religious and secular compassionate acts and their association with psychological well-being.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Compassion is central to moral and relational functioning, yet its determinants and systemic effects remain a subject of debate. The study linked to the current protocol will examine how fear of and openness to compassion from others are associated with well-being, emotional openness, and prosocial behavior. Additionally, it investigates how spirituality, religiosity, and secularism shape interpretations of compassion and altruism among working adults from diverse religious and ethnic backgrounds. Methods: This research protocol refers to a future study, not started yet, that will employ a concurrent mixed-methods design, combining quantitative and qualitative online survey data with qualitative Microsoft Teams face-to-face interviews to examine how adults interpret compassionate acts through religious, secular, or blended lenses. Biographical and socio-demographic characteristics will be treated as independent variables, psychological outcomes as dependent variables, and received compassion as a moderating variable influencing these associations. Guided by the Social Ecological Model, both strands will be analyzed across individual, interpersonal, organizational, and community levels. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be integrated through joint displays and side-by-side interpretation, enabling statistical patterns to be directly compared with narrative themes and producing a coherent multilevel account of how compassion shapes well-being and relational functioning. The quantitative component will incorporate precise regression-based moderation models, covariate adjustment protocols, and missing data handling, while the qualitative strand will rely strictly on thematic analysis to avoid inappropriate methodological crossover. Expected results: As this is a research protocol, no assumptions are made regarding the direction, magnitude, or significance of findings. The study to which the protocol refers is designed to examine how individuals interpret acts of compassion received from others through religious, secular, or blended frameworks and whether these interpretations are associated with psychological and relational outcomes. Findings will be interpreted as exploratory and context dependent, with conclusions limited to the study sample and design. Discussion: Findings of the future study may contribute to future discussions concerning compassion within public health, education, and social care contexts; however, any practical recommendations should be regarded as preliminary and exploratory pending further research using longitudinal and representative designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.