ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Multimodal Salvage Protocol for the Treatment of Severe Postrhinoplasty Nasal Vestibular Stenosis: A Case Report.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe nasal vestibular stenosis is an increasingly recognized iatrogenic complication of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Multiply-revised cases are particularly difficult to manage because previous procedures may compromise the vestibular microcirculation, whereas prolonged stenting alone risks ischemic restenosis. We describe an individualized, staged multimodal salvage approach and illustrate it in a single patient. Stage 1 reopened the obstructed vestibule with scar excision, a local skin flap, and a custom stent, followed by ∼3 months of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) and monthly intralesional platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intended to condition the scar bed and improve tissue pliability. Stage 2 provided definitive aesthetic reconstruction tailored to the anatomical defects, supported by a 12-month adjunctive regimen of tapered nasal stenting, peri-incisional PRP, a CAP cycle alternating antimicrobial and wound-healing modes, and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide at escalating concentrations (5-40 mg/mL). The patient was a 27-year-old woman with bilateral vestibular stenosis and complete left nostril obstruction after 15 previous nasal procedures. After Stage 1, bilateral airflow was clinically improved and the vestibular tissue was softer and better perfused on examination at 3 months. Stage 2 employed a philtral advancement flap, costal and auricular cartilage grafts, and a buccal mucosal graft. At more than 3 years, nasal airflow and aesthetic contour remained stable on clinical assessment, with no recurrence of stenosis and no further stenting. This single case suggests that a staged surgical strategy combined with a structured biologic and stenting regimen may be a useful salvage option; further cases and objective functional assessment are required to confirm its value.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.