ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Integrated smart flock monitoring of reproductive parameters for lambing date prediction in merino sheep.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Integrated flock monitoring systems may improve reproductive decision-making by linking maternal, male, and mating records within a single digital framework. This study evaluated whether a smart flock monitoring system integrating RFID identification, automated body-weight recording, mating-marker data, estrus observation, ram breeding soundness examination, semen evaluation, and pregnancy diagnosis could support lambing-date prediction under commercial Merino flock conditions. Methods: The study included 210 multiparous ewes and 11 mature rams; five rams underwent detailed breeding-soundness, semen-quality, and service-capacity evaluations. Sixty ewes underwent an 11-day progesterone-sponge synchronization protocol followed by PMSG administration and were allocated to two mating-management groups. Among routinely managed ewes, 51 formed the primary lambing-date analytical dataset, while 49 with complete natural-mating and lambing records were evaluated retrospectively using the fixed 148-day prediction rule. Results: Estrus duration showed marked individual variability. The interval from induced estrus to subsequent estrus was 16.33 ± 0.28 days in Group 1 and 19.95 ± 0.17 days in Group 2 ( Discussion: Integrated smart flock monitoring can generate biologically meaningful reproductive datasets and may support practical lambing-date prediction, but the regression findings require confirmation in larger independent populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.