ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Climate-related events, human mobility, and migrant health in Latin America and the Caribbean: evidence gaps and public health implications.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To map the available evidence on climate-related events, human mobility, and health outcomes in migrant populations across Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: We conducted a structured mini review using an evidence-mapping approach to characterize the available literature. Searches were performed in BIREME/LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science and were complemented by a manual search of the gray literature. The search, selection, data-charting, and reporting procedures were informed by relevant elements of the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and established methodological guidance for evidence synthesis. Results: Eight publications were included: six empirical qualitative studies, one personal opinion paper, and one scoping review. None of the six empirical studies compared migrant and local populations, and only one incorporated an intra-group comparison. The populations examined were primarily adults and included climate migrants, economic migrants, and forcibly displaced or forced migrants. The events reported encompassed hurricanes, storms, droughts, floods, and shifts in precipitation patterns, although four of the eight publications addressed climate change in general terms. Health effects were sparsely characterized: four of the eight publications reported acute conditions, whereas chronic conditions were not identified and specific infectious diseases were not reported. Discussion: The available evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, and poorly disaggregated. Future research should specify climate events, mobility conditions, psychosocial vulnerabilities, and health effects in order to inform equitable, rights-based, and community-oriented public-health responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.