ArticleCureus2026
Duodenal Perforation After Blunt Trauma: CT and Operative Correlation of an Unexpected Finding.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duodenal injury from blunt abdominal trauma is uncommon and often difficult to diagnose early due to its retroperitoneal location and nonspecific clinical presentation, which delays proper management and increases morbidity and mortality. A 32-year-old man sustained blunt abdominal trauma in a motor vehicle accident. CT showed active contrast extravasation from the first duodenum with moderate hemoperitoneum and associated American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) III liver lacerations. Exploratory laparotomy confirmed duodenal perforation treated by primary repair and feeding jejunostomy. Hepatic injuries were managed conservatively. Postoperative course was uneventful. Oral feeding was resumed three weeks later after removal of the jejunostomy tube. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of blunt duodenal injuries and emphasizes the pivotal role of contrast-enhanced CT in their early detection. Direct imaging signs, although infrequent, are highly specific and should prompt urgent surgical management. A review of the literature confirms that early diagnosis, accurate injury grading, and tailored surgical repair are critical determinants of outcome, while delays beyond 24 hours markedly increase complication rates and mortality. High clinical suspicion, appropriate imaging, and timely operative intervention are keys to improving outcomes in blunt duodenal perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.