ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
One Health - One Planet - One Mind: integrating eco-anxiety into the One Health paradigm.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change and environmental degradation affect not only ecosystems and physical health but also psychological well-being. Eco-anxiety-defined as chronic or anticipatory distress related to perceived environmental decline-has emerged as a growing public mental health concern. Although One Health frameworks recognise the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental health, psychosocial processes shaping behavioural responses to environmental change remain underdeveloped within One Health discourse. This conceptual review positions eco-anxiety as a psychosocial determinant operating within the One Health-One Planet-One Mind continuum. Rather than treating eco-anxiety solely as a mental health outcome, we conceptualize it as a mediating and bidirectional process through which environmental disruption influences human behavior, multispecies health outcomes, and system-level resilience. Drawing on interdisciplinary evidence from environmental psychology, planetary mental health, and One Health literature, we synthesise pathways through which eco-anxiety may promote adaptive behaviors-such as environmental stewardship and community mobilization-or, when unaddressed, contribute to maladaptive responses including disengagement and reduced resilience. We propose a conceptual framework that embeds eco-anxiety within One Health architecture, illustrating feedback loops linking planetary change, psychosocial responses, behavioural pathways, and multispecies health outcomes. We conclude by outlining implications for One Health policy, monitoring, and intervention, highlighting the value of integrating psychosocial determinants into multisectoral strategies addressing climate-related health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.