Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42787971›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pediatrics2026

Vacuum-Assisted Delivery and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Retrospective Case-Control Study at a Lebanese Hospital.

Maribelle Azar, Tara Chahwan, Souheil Hallit, Habib Barakat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maribelle AzarSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon, usek.edu.lb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0050-6841
Tara ChahwanSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon, usek.edu.lb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8435-7511
Souheil HallitSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon, usek.edu.lb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-5689
Habib BarakatSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon, usek.edu.lb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5417-1386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is a common obstetric intervention used to facilitate childbirth. In Lebanon, the practice remains inconsistently applied. Standardized national guidelines and their impact on neonatal outcomes, particularly neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, remain insufficiently explored. Objective: To examine the association between VAVD and NICU admission in a tertiary hospital in Lebanon. Methods: A retrospective hospital-based case-control study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2023. Cases were defined as neonates admitted to the NICU after delivery, and controls as neonates not requiring NICU admission. Prior exposure (mode of delivery: VAVD vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery) and maternal, obstetric, and neonatal variables were compared between the two groups. All live-born neonates ( Results: VAVD was not significantly associated with NICU admission (adjusted OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.00-4.49; Conclusion: In this setting, VAVD was not associated with an increased likelihood of NICU admission. Strengthening guidelines and training for VAVD use may help optimize neonatal outcomes in Lebanon.

Indexed as

Lebanonmaternal–fetal factorsneonatal outcomesNICU admissionretrospective case-control studyvacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD)

Identifiers

PMID42787971
PMCPMC13602815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.